Town Obtains Injunction Against Hotel’s Use To House Asylum-Seeking Migrants—Change From Up to 30 Days Transient Use To Up To Four-Month Occupancy Constituted a Change In Use—New York State Law Did Not Preempt Local Zoning Ordinances—Issue of Whether the Hotel Had Standing To Assert the Rights of Others—Defendants’ Theories Suffered From “Underdevelopment and Disjointedness”

The town of Orangetown (Town) commenced an action against hotel defendants. The Town alleged that the defendants violated local zoning laws and sought declaratory judgments. The court granted the Town’s motion for a preliminary injunction.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]