Attorney review clauses, notices at residential home bidding auctions under consideration by NJ Supreme Court

The New Jersey Supreme Court is slated to hear arguments on whether the three-day attorney review clause and notice regarding the risks associated with not seeking an attorney review are mandated in realtor-prepared residential real estate contracts in bidding auctions. The New Jersey State Bar Association (NJSBA) argued that they are mandated, in Sullivan v. Max Spann Real Estate & Auction Co., Docket No. 085225.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]