Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Publication Date: 2024-05-13 Practice Area:Government Industry:Legal Services | Real Estate | State and Local Government Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Sumners Attorneys:For plaintiff: King, Moench & Collins, LLP, attorneys for appellant (Jerry J. Dasti and Patrick F. Varga, on the briefs) for defendant: Lowenstein Sandler, LLP (A. Matthew Boxer, Peter Matthew Slocum, and Stephanie Ashley, on the brief); Beattie Padovano, LLC, and Hill Wallack LLP (Antimo Anthony Del Vecchio and Thomas Francis Carroll, of counsel and on the brief; Daniel L. Steinhagen and Keith Arnold Loughlin, on the brief); Albert H. Wunsch, III, respondent pro se Case Number: A-2765-21
Municipality Was a Party Subject to Sanctions Under the FLS Since It Could Seek Sanctions
Publication Date: 2024-05-13 Practice Area:Tax Industry: Court:Tax Court Judge:Judge Brennan Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 008823-2023
Plaintiff City of Jersey City moved for summary judgment against defendants Dwaipayan and Charkraborty Gosh concerning the Goshs' eligibility for a five-year property tax exemption for a nine-unit condominium under N.J.S.A.
Publication Date: 2024-05-13 Practice Area:Insurance Law Industry: Court:Appellate Division Judge:Per Curiam Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: A-1375-22
Appellant appealed the grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant in his action for uninsured motorist benefits.
Challenge to Local Marijuana Ordinances as Federally Preempted Denied Where State Recreational Marijuana Laws Were Not Inconsistent or an Obstacle to Federal Enforcement
Publication Date: 2024-05-10 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Appellate Division Judge:Per Curiam Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: A-3120-21
Appellant appealed a decision by respondent, the New Jersey State Parole Board, denying him parole and setting a ninety-six-month future eligibility term.
Plaintiff moved for summary judgment and defendants moved for partial summary judgment in plaintiff's fraud, New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and breach of fiduciary duty action.